download Butterfly Effect, The dvd online

September 20th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Butterfly Effect, The

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Butterfly Effect, The

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Butterfly Effect (Video Preview).avi18.48 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “Butterfly Effect, The” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

Butterfly Effect, The Reviewed By Chris Parry Posted 01/17/04 15:39:42

"If you have to make a teen movie, at least try to make it as smart as this." (Worth A Look)

SCREENED AT THE 2004 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL: If you’d have asked me three hours ago what I think of Ashton Kutcher, I’d have borrowed from Jack Nicholson and told you he can “shampoo my crotch”. Between mugging for the audience on Punk’d and mugging for the audience on That 70’s Show and… heck, I don’t even know what he was doing on Dude, Where’s My Car. So take all that and combine it with a healthy dose of overexposure stemming from Kutcher’s Demi Moore Oedipus Syndrome, and the prospect of going to a movie featuring him as a lead fills me with about as much glee as Mad Cow Disease. But hey, I’m at Sundance, so what am I gonna do – avoid the big show? And bugger me if I’m lying – the flick was really worth the trip.Kutcher is Evan, a kid who has some problems. Every time the stress level rises in his life, he blacks out and wakes up later, with no idea what’s gone down in the past half hour or so. This would be okay if it happened while he was playing X-Box, but when it happens as the neighbor’s kid is about to set fire to your dog, or when your friend’s dad is setting up a video camera and telling you to take your shirt off, you’d have to curse your sense of timing.So Evan’s psychiatrist recommends that he keep a journal of everything he does, to try to help him jog his memory. But over the following years, as Evan writes everything down religiously, he still blacks out as he and his messed up friends go from misadventure to misdemeanor to felony, and his memories stay blocked out. Behind all this, Evan’s crazy dad has long the same problem, and while locked away in the nuthouse, he claims to have created a way to go back in time and make bad things better. Before long we see that Evan has inherited the exact same skill, learning that when he reads his old journal entries, he’s zapped back in time to the exact scene described. Once there, Evan makes small changes to try to correct past horrors, but such corrections don’t always turn out as planned.Which is probably more story than you need to know about the story, but if you saw the trailer, none of what I’ve just written is news to you. And if you didn’t see the trailer - well, deal.So anyone who isn’t A) female or B) under 18 is probably muttering to themselves about now, “I don’t care if you enjoyed it, there’s no way I’m paying to see Kutcher. Forget about it. Not going to happen.” And I can understand that. But, dude, seriously, you’ve got to understand what I’m saying here - this is a good film. No, really. It’s actually good. Very good. Surprisingly good. Good enough to tell people to go see the thing.Oh sure, it has its problems. The dialogue is far from sparkling, with words such as "irreprehensible" finding their way into the finished script when no such word exists in the English language. You could blame Kutcher for maybe fluffing a line in such an instance, but the rest of the dialogue on offer really isn’t much better, rising only just above the level of langugage you might expect if George W. Bush was moonlighting as a screenwriter.But the cast is almost uniformly top rate – from Kutcher (again, seriously), to Amy Smart as the love of his life, to Melora Walters as his mother, to Elden Henson as his best buddy, to Ethan Suplee as his college roommate. It’s not necessarily that these kids are made to perform acting stunts by the screenplay in front of them, but rather that they’re all (for the most part) genuinely talented indie actors. There are no Rachel Leigh Cook’s or Freddie Prinze Jr’s here. Kutcher is the closest thing you could get right now to being a national flash-in-the-pan pin-up boy, but he handles himself well in this role despite the overwhelming hype surrounding him and his lack of dramatic history. Amy Smart is given the toughest task of the lot, having to take her character to multiple realities, from coke-addled hooker to dolled-up sorority girl, and she does enough with each to prove that she’s far surpassed the "pretty girl” label. As an aside, it’s great to see Ethan Suplee pushing way `out` into the mainstream at last. With his recent outing in Cold Mountain, and a good supporting character turn here in a film that is bound to make some money, it surely can’t be long before some smart guy in Hollywood writes a screenplay with a ‘big boned’ guy as the lead, giving Suplee the solo spotlight that his talents have long deserved. It’d be a shame if he spends the best years of his long career filling ‘fat guy’ roles, when he’s got more to offer.But to me, what really adds to this already impressive film is a sly, cynical, almost ‘Very Bad Things’-style dark humor running through the background, causing the audience to giggle at times that they really don’t want to giggle. Some critics, generally those who don’t get the darker humor or who feel duty-bound to hammer anything Kutcher-related, will assume this is a case of people laughing at the movie rather than with it, but let me tell you, I laughed a lot with The Butterfly Effect, and barring some dialogue whoopsies, there wasn’t a time when I rolled my eyes at the thing. To be honest, if I’d gone in with a grudge, I could have sat here and ripped pieces out of this film for the entire length of the review, but what would be the point?Frankly, if all movies aimed at a teen market were handled as soundly as this… well, let’s face it, teenagers would stop going to movies. They’re really not very smart, after all (don’t even try to defend yourselves, teens, not after making Bad Boys II one of the highest grossing films of the last five years).Well directed, well scored, well paced, well performed, and written well enough to avoid the sort of massive plot holes usually associated with this kind of genre, The Butterfly Effect isn’t Citizen Kane, but it is far and away the best ‘teen’ film that I’ve seen since Ghostworld… Kutcher or not.
download movie trailers
download full length movies
watch movies online
watch english Butterfly Effect, The movies
video download
watch english movies online
full length video

Murder by Numbers legal movie downloads

September 19th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Murder by Numbers

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Murder by Numbers

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Murder by Numbers (Video Preview).avi14.22 MBDOWNLOAD

Murder by Numbers Reviewed By Jack Sommersby Posted 12/13/02 01:46:52

"Filmmaking-by-Numbers" (Total Crap)

One of the laziest, underdeveloped, sophomoric psychological thrillers ever to disgrace the silver screen. Anemic acting and lethargic directing make this both a trial and tribulation to sit through. Sandra Bullock, who was completely winning in the underrated Miss Congeniality, should stick to a genre she’s fit for.Having given an outstanding performance as a tomboy-ish FBI agent in the buoyant and bright Miss Congeniality, I had hope that Sandra Bullock (previously an acquired taste with this reviewer) had realized her dramatic limitations and saw fit to partake in films that required lucid emotionalism in small quantities in scarce instances. If the moronic The Net and ludicrous In Love and War hadn’t already validated her lack of depth and range as an actress, then the preachy, pandering-down-to rehab drama 28 Days certainly did. Bullock’s got charisma and an alert reserve which occasionally gives her an edge with one-liners, but she essentially lacks the variety and internal resources needed to suggest more of a character than what’s been written. Freed up without being bound to act "serious", she was funny and loose and ingratiating in Miss Congeniality; she also beautifully underplayed the character’s loneliness without italicizing it. Like Renee Zellweger in last year’s Bridget Jones’s Diary, Bullock started with the woman and worked her way up to the character’s eccentricities, rather than starting with the latter and forsaking the former in typical Julia Roberts fashion. So it’s all the more unfortunate that Bullock has regressed back to her naive self by executive-producing and casting herself as a determined homicide detective in Murder by Numbers, a film that not only offers up a terminally vacant lead performance by its star, but is nothing short of a catastrophic disaster.What we have here are two smart and savvy high-schoolers, Richard Haywood (Ryan Gosling) and Justin Pendleton (Michael Pitts), both from affluent families in a small coastal Northern California community, going out and committing "the perfect murder" for the sheer hell of it to see if they can get away with it, and to prove their moral superiority in the process. The way the filmmakers present it, they’re the victims of neglectful parenting and soulless materialism, where credit cards and expensive cars are God-entitled givens, and love and compassion are nothing more than commodities to be brokered off and embraced by the middle and lower classes — the suckers of the world. Nothing new here on a thematic basis to be sure, and neither on a contextual one either. Like Larry Clark’s Bully, this is another film that exploits the visceral details of a heinous crime instead of tackling the social implications behind it. Since the teens’ moral sense is stunted and shallow, their home lives are predictably depicted in a bland and impersonal decor to mirror and reflect upon this. This is elemental interpretation at best, it’s lazy, and merely represents rather than incisively presents a probing, disturbing picture of an ever-increasing side of Americana gone horribly awry. And to prove there’s not a cliched stone unturned here, the screenwriter, Tony Gayton, has given the character of Justin, the conscience-stricken one of the two, a fresh-faced girlfriend, Lisa (Agnes Bruckner), who not only lives in a small apartment, but is an artist as well. (She’s depicted as a life-loving Plain Jane intended to convey "purity".)Unfortunately, their pursuer, Bullock’s Cassie Mayweather (no, I didn’t make the name up), isn’t any more alluring or interesting. Conjuring up memories of Bruce Willis’ washed-up cop in Striking Distance, Cassie lives on a houseboat isolated from the mainstream, so we know she’s toiling over internal demons. Clad in black with a mood to match, Cassie’s good at her job but has become so embittered not only at life in general but at her fellow officers that no one wants to work with her anymore. So it’s not too surprising that Cassie’s new partner, Sam (Ben Chaplin), looks uneasy. At first, we think it’s his exposure to corpses after having transferred over from Vice (in this small town?!), but we soon see he has no idea how to relate to Cassie; she’s the quintessential closed-off loner, acknowledging those only when she needs something. Bits and pieces of a violent event from Cassie’s past are served up via flashbacks, but they serve no real purpose except as teaser trailers leading up to a ho-hum revelation that contributes nothing substantial to the story and gives new meaning to the term "excess baggage". And Bullock’s performance is depressingly one-note. In going for the dramatic badge of honor she’s sublimated her comic instincts and fresh appeal for the sake of attempting to be taken seriously as an actress; but Bullock’s range is considerably limited, so the built-in negatives of the part are only compounded.Flawed characterizations are always a liability in a film, but the severity of them depends mostly on the type of film they’re incorporated within. If it’s a trashy action or horror film, then the damage is usually minimal; a comedy, a little more so; in a drama, considerably more. But in what’s been intended as a psychological thriller, the result is simply devastating — especially since the story is essentially character-oriented and -driven. We’re supposed to be enthralled by these cunning teens toying with Cassie, anticipating her next moves and foretelling the forensic evidence they’ve purposely left behind. They’ve framed the school janitor (a wasted Christopher Penn) for the crime, but have it fixed where the police will initially suspect them; they get a kick, a real rush out of manipulating people and coming close to danger with a safety net made out of well-thought-out wit. When Cassie informs Richard that the expensive boots he reported stolen are tied to the murder scene, Richard daunts, "Are you saying the person who stole my boots is mixed up in this?". But good moments like this are way too far and few between. For the most part, we couldn’t care less about the characters, so the actors have a tough time justifying their presence and commanding our attention, with the badly constructed screenplay unwisely revealing what the villains are up to before Cassie gets wise, which saps the story of any immediacy. If the hero(ine)-villain match-up here was infused with tension (as the one composed of Andy Garcia and Richard Gere in the Internal Affairs was), then the mind games being played out would provide some fascination. They don’t, so the story essentially has no backbone, nothing to fall back on, and the flaws, therefore, are even more glaring.After having vomited at the body-dumping site (the body belonging to a twentysomething woman picked out on a whim), would the whiz-kid Justin just leave it there for Forensics to dabble over instead of simply cleaning it up? The janitor has been set up as the patsy and is killed at his hideaway later on, but it’s only by sheer luck that he spies the detectives speaking to Richard at school, otherwise he’d have had no reason to flee, the police would have picked him up when they intended, and the case would have been cracked in no time. When Cassie’s shooting it out with Richard at the end and they wind up in separate rooms, he announces he only has one bullet left and fires, Cassie suspects suicide, and then goes over to investigate. Hasn’t she seen more than five films of this type where the villain isn’t really dead and will sure as hell come up behind you for acting the fool? And after a cordial romance develops between Justin and Lisa, for no discernible reason, she jumps into the sack with the callous Richard, Justin finds out and calls her a slut, she slaps him and walks away, and then during the final quarter she suddenly becomes his ally, and all so she can make a crucial phone call to Cassie so the final confrontation can happen. Not only is this tacky, but screenwriter Gayton violates a cardinal rule of drama: instead of resolving a conflict, he dissolves it, removing the implications behind it. There´s even a "Boo!" moment to be had when an animal jumps out of nowhere, startling the heroine — which, in this case, turns out to be a baboon (Don´t ask). Perhaps if a director like, say, Joseph Ruben, whose thrillers The Stepfather and True Believer were stylish, taut and seamless, had taken the reins, just maybe he’d have been able to help glide the story over some of the many inconsistencies. Alas, the director is Barbet Schroeder, who demonstrated with the sub-par 1995 Kiss of Death remake and the 1998 howler Desperate Measures a complete incompetence at eliciting and sustaining suspense. When working on a smaller scale, like 1987’s magical Barfly or 1990’s Oscar-winning Reversal of Fortune, Schroeder can transport you to a specific time and place with masterly ease that exudes texture and authenticity; whether it’s the seedy ski-row L.A. streets or the posh seaside Rhode Island estates, here’s a director who can conjure up the kind of rich atmosphere that clings. And being that the central characters’ lives he was depicting were more or less aimless (Mickey Rourke’s drunken poet Henry Chinaski, and Jeremy Irons’ pompously aloof Claus Von Bulow), Schroeder’s problems with pacing and narrative drive weren’t so noticeable — they matched up with the characters’ off-kilter social and behavioral rhythms. But Kiss of Death ended up as a series of stops and starts, while Desperate Measures couldn’t generate enough in the way of tempo to get over its numerous improbability hurdles.With Murder by Numbers, Schroeder’s work is simply lacking and, worse, impersonal, as if he needed to make a house payment, agreed to this sorry state of affairs, and decided to carry things out in the most perfunctory manner possible. He doesn’t seem to have even interpreted the material, much less expounded upon it to create a vision of his own; we’re kept at an aesthetic distance from the story, never horrified at the horrifics, because the director himself seems distant and indifferent to what he’s presenting before us. And the film has the same narrative inertness as Schroeder’s Before and After, which, too, dealt with teenagers and murder, and, like Numbers, is so frustrating in its failure to suitably involve you on a responsive level that it practically zonks you right out. With a cat-and-mouse game developing between Cassie and the villains, our innards should be constricting into a knot, and the disturbing implications of the material should make us dread the scenes to come. Again, there’s no propulsion to the story, the police procedurals and forensic details are strictly ho-hum, and the villains fail to enthrall (they might as well have robbed their school’s bakery sale for all we care). Not helping matters are Schroeder’s unremarkable, tv-style compositions, which make little or no creative use of space; there’s a cramped-up feel to each and every one, as if the director were the ultimate anal-retentive fuddy-duddy mortified at the mere thought of framing a shot with pancahe. (Alas, the great cinematographer Luciano Tovoli’s talents are wasted — except during the finale, where he finally gets to strut his stuff.)As was also the case with the deplorable Panic Room, Murder by Numbers teases us with a tantalizing story premise yet fails to develop and follow through on it, leaving us with fifteen minutes of a passable appetizer and then an hour and a half of a substandard entree. And it’s something so much worse than just bad: it’s downright incompetent — and thoroughly so, on just about every conceivable level (excepting, possibly, the production design: while the actors occupying space aren’t convincing, the interesting sets and artifacts surrounding them are). Instead of originality, we get retreads of cliches we’ve grown ever so wary of, along with direct steals from other films of its type, like In Cold Blood, where we’re supposed to buy that the more vicious of the villains is the actual murderer when in fact it’s the meeker of them. If you think I’ve spoiled some grand revelation, don’t fret because after seeing Richard throw a towel over their tied-up victim’s face rather than look at it, a mental alarm goes off, and you’d have to be blind not to pick up on its significance later. Just what kind of film was Murder by Numbers designed to function as? A psychological thriller, right? But it hasn’t been constructed and engineered with any dramatic depth or intensity. A character study? The villains are bland and their motives Psych 101 stuff, with Cassie no more complex than a stock cop character in one of those boo-hiss shows to be found on a high-numbered UHF channel. A timely mediation on the decaying sense of principles and decency in today’s youth? Like the characters, depth and insight are in short supply, with trumped-up generalizations in full stock. Of course, the film tires to be all three, so instead of failing miserably as one thing, it triples its friendly-fire casualties. Yet it’s so devoid of creativity and identity that it’s hard to despise it as much as you’d like — getting angry at it, showing it just an iota of emotion, would be giving it more emotion than it gives you. Still, it’s so incredibly negligible and downright ineffectual that it gives you a newfound respect for mediocrity.@Jack Sommersby, 2003Advice: Catch an episode of tv’s "CSI" instead.
Murder by Numbers dvd downloads
download movies
watch videos on line
movies buy
watch Murder by Numbers full movies online
watch full movie online
full movie

download hot One Last Thing… videos

September 18th, 2008 by buymovies

Download One Last Thing...

DOWNLOAD MOVIE One Last Thing…

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
One Last Thing… (Video Preview).avi13.59 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “One Last Thing…” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

One Last Thing…
The Movie:

There comes a time in a reviewer’s life that you have to watch a movie you don’t really want to watch. Honestly, I was not too excited about this film when I first picked it up. Then my wife pulled a movie out for us to watch and she just happened to pick out One Last Thing. After sitting down, grabbing some pizza and a drink, I found myself actually enjoying the film. I wanted to find out what was wrong with this kid, and I really felt for him. I ended up having a great time watching the movie, which was a big surprise to me.


Directed by Alex Steyemark, One Last Thing is about a boy’s journey to fulfill one last thing during his life. It is more than that though–it is about a boy becoming a man in the short time that he has left on this earth.

We are introduced to all the main characters right away. We meet high school sophomore Dylan (Michael Angarano) and his two friends Ricky and Slap (Matt Bush and Gideon Glick respectively) as they sit around smoking weed for “medical reasons” though it is only truly medicinal for Dylan’s terminal cancer. As they try to decide if Dylan should go fishing with his favorite professional football player Jason O’Malley (Johnny Messner) for his wish from the Make a Wish Foundation…or go on a date with his dream girl Nikki Sinclair (Sunny Mabrey) the supermodel…we also get to meet Dylan’s mom Carol (Cynthia Nixon), who struggles with letting her son go. Of course, this is an expected reaction from any mother who finds out her son is dying at too young an age.

Dylan decides to go with the wish for a weekend with the model…only he decides this right before he has to announce it in front of the foundation, to the surprise of everyone present. After all, this is quite a controversial wish! It seems part of the reason he decides to not go fishing is because his deceased father (played by Ethan Hawke) is the only one he ever fished with…he wants to keep those memories intact. Dylan’s journey begins after meeting Nikki for only a brief moment before getting turned down to go on a date with her. Dylan decides to go to New York to win Nikki’s heart over, and Ricky and Slap want to tag along for the ride. They try to raise money for the trip by selling all of Dylan’s worldly possessions on TV…they get lucky when O’Malley wants to buy an Eagles signed football for $10,000. When they finally get to NYC, Ricky and Slap’s true colors come out. There is a constant reminder of how horny these two are. Their entire goal in the film seems to be to visit a strip club again and again. Dylan, however, does whatever it takes to find Nikki. He is able to use his celebrity status from being on the Post’s front cover to get them where they need to be, but we can see how his condition continues to worsen.

Throughout the movie there is constant struggle in all the characters lives…except from Ricky and Slap (unless you consider them getting kicked out of a strip club). Dylan struggles to grow up in the short amount of time he has left, trying to figure out what life is about and what love is. Dylan’s mom struggles to let go of her son. Nikki can’t figure out if the life she is living is actually the life she wants to live. Although the plot is very simple, we learn about the inner struggle of several different characters. There are definitely holes in the story that could have been cleaned up a little. Especially with Ricky and Slap being nearly pointless. But in the end, all the storylines seem to get tied up neatly. All in all, I got a decent amount of enjoyment from One Last Thing.

The DVD

Video:

Presented in 1080i 16×9, One Last Thing is a very good transfer. The contrast is high, but not too high to be noticeable, over-saturated, or overexposed. The colors throughout the film are very vibrant, especially in the streets of NYC and during the few beach scenes, which is a little surprising considering it’s being presented in 1080i and not 1080p. There was a little noise in the dark areas when opposed to the beautiful, good-contrast scenes, but this is a common thing that tends to affect many movies. There were times when I felt like the white balance was off, especially when Dylan was in bathrooms or his high school hallways. This gave it a yellow tinge that distracted me from the otherwise great colors.

One thing in particular that I did really enjoy were the camera movements. In particular, there is a scene where Dylan is watching a tape of his dad talking to him and the way that they panned into different parts of his face, leaving other parts out, was incredible and really set the tone of the scene nicely.

Sound:

Presented in 5.1 Dolby Digital & 5.1 DTS. One Last Thing consists of mostly dialogue, so considering this we have good highs and lows. There is also a good soundtrack that takes you on the journey with Dylan.

Extras:

Higher Definition: Hosted by Rober Wilonsky, we get a very nice cheese ball host that is over the top with his explanation of the movie. It honestly doesn’t feel like he even knows what the movie is about. There are interviews with the cast and the director; mainly about their thoughts on the story and how the storyline progressed. Not much here on this one.

Commentary: Director Alex Steyermark gives us his words of wisdom on One Last Thing. We learn how difficult it was for the studios to pick this one up and how HDNet finally ended up with it. Steyermark’s commentary was very slow…he managed to discuss some difficulties with shooting, timing during certain scenes, casting choices, and so on. My favorite quote, “It’s like Dorothy going to see the Wizard of OZ.” Yep, that’s how he explains the movie! You won’t miss much if you skip this commentary.

Final Thoughts:

A little slow overall, but a decent movie about holding onto what is important in life. Basically it is all about a boy’s quest that inspires you and moves your heart. With a quality transfer, good audio, and a simple but inspirational storyline (that unfortunately tries to be a little bigger then what it actually is). This is a good one to rent and enjoy for an otherwise empty night.
download new release movies
watch One Last Thing… movie
divx movie downloads
download dvd movies
One Last Thing… movie downloads
download full length One Last Thing… movies
One Last Thing… video download

September 17th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Ringer, The

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Ringer, The

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Ringer (Video Preview).avi9.49 MBDOWNLOAD

Ringer, The

Johnny Knoxville’s Steve pretends to be a retard named Jeffie so he can compete in the Special Olympics and win money in The Ringer. Directed by Barry W. Blaustein (who’s written many Eddie Murphy movies like Coming to America, Boomerang and The Nutty Professor) and written by Ricky Blitt (Family Guy), the story is not stupid or tasteless as one would expect. It’s silly but is also funny, and despite a very weak beginning, it gets very good once Knoxville gets to the pre-Olympic competitions and is joined by the other mentally challenged athletes. Sorry about the retard remark before, btw.

But why does he go to the Olympics? Because he needs to raise money to pay for surgery for a friend, who is not actually a friend but an old guy he should’ve fired at work but instead decided to hire as a lawn mower and after an accident the guy ended up with three fingers chopped off his hand. And it’s a huge hospital bill because apparently in this movie’s time there are none of those organizations that pay the bills for you if you can’t. But oh well, I guess it’s necessary for the story to work. There’s another reason too, as Steve’s uncle Gary (played by a what-the-hell-are-you-doing-taking-these-roles Brian Cox) needs money to pay the mobs for his gambling. At the Olympics, Jeffie must compete against Jimmy (played by Leonard Flowers), the mentally challenged superstar who’s won the games 6 times in a row. There’s also Katherine Heigl’s Lynn, an instructor at the Olympics who helps Jeffie along the way while he falls in love with her.

There’s been some controversy lately about this movie, as South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker are saying the movie rips off an episode of their series they released in early 2004, but the movie’s producers say the script was written before that. Lawsuits may be filed, but whatever the outcome, the South Park episode was funny, and movie is funny too. Supported (mostly) by a cast of real life mentally challenged actors, The Ringer shows its heart, and it’s surprisingly respectful of the characters we all thought it would be making fun of.

download hot Ringer, The videos
Ringer, The movie downloads
watch Ringer, The full movie
download Ringer, The dvd online
watch english movies

watch Ringer, The videos online

Biker Boyz full movie downloads

September 16th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Biker Boyz

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Biker Boyz

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Biker Boyz (Video Preview).avi16.05 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “Biker Boyz” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

Biker Boyz Reviewed By EricDSnider Posted 06/30/03 17:24:13

"We could go on all day listing the reasons not to take this movie seriously" (Pretty Bad)

There are many reasons not to take "Biker Boyz" seriously as a film, not the least of which is its title, what with its cutesy alliteration and the inappropriate "z."Also, we cannot discount the fact that this film contains both Lisa Bonet and Kid Rock, neither of whom, I think we can all agree, ought to be taken seriously as anything other than a former Cosby kid and a dirtbag Pamela Anderson-screwer, respectively. We must also bear in mind that "Biker Boyz" has characters named Smoke, Wood, Flip, Kid, Chu Chu, Soul Train and Queenie. How different is this from "Our Gang," which had Spanky, Alfalfa, Buckwheat and Porky? If we were not expected to take the Little Rascals seriously, why should we take "Biker Boyz" seriously?The film can also be disregarded because it is about motorcycles. (Its secondary theme: People ride motorcycles.) This is a bold, sweeping statement, I realize, but I firmly believe that movies, if they are to have any impact on the human condition, ought to be about sentient beings, and not about machinery. Especially not loud, hateful machinery.But the best reason not to take "Biker Boyz" seriously is that it is dull, unfocused, meandering stuff. It believes it has the makings of insightful drama, and then it ends by having its hero tell us that he has learned to "represent straight up." I don’t even know what that means. Much of the rest of the dialogue is equally trite and/or nonsensical.Our hero happens to be nicknamed Kid (Derek Luke), and he is the son of a man named Will (Eriq La Salle), who busts his butt working as a mechanic for a guy called Smoke (Laurence Fishburne). Smoke, clad in black leather — if Fishburne is wearing this, what is the guy from the Village People wearing? — is the undisputed "King of California," at least in terms of late-night motorcycle street-racing. In other areas, such as quilting and television repair, I assume he concedes his crown to more qualified practitioners. At any rate, Will gets himself killed in the first scene when a race goes awry and a chopper goes fly, that’s amore. Flash ahead six months, to where Kid is angry and cocky, secretly practicing to take Smoke’s throne in order to, I don’t know, prove himself or something. His worried mother (Vanessa Bell Calloway) frets and stews and lectures, like mothers are supposed to do in movies like these. Smoke, a good friend of the family who has offered Will’s widow any help she needs, tries to keep Kid from getting reckless and killing himself.The film, directed with a ham fist by Reggie Rock Bythewood — who wrote a few episodes of "A Different World," which explains the presence of Lisa Bonet — flits from one idea to the next with apparent randomness. There are family crises, some kitchen-sink drama, and a lot of scenes where testosterone-laden men glare and speak melodramatic challenges to one another in icy cool voices. When one of these men is Kid Rock, you know the movie has given up on being credible.The one unifying theme in it all? Motorcycle racing. The motorcycle clubs of California probably have some inherent drama to them, what with the danger and the camaraderie and all, but this film fails to find it. Instead, it uses the same conflicts and character arcs as too many movies before it, never giving us a reason to care about anyone.There is also the matter of padding, which the film indulges in capriciously. Between the last scene, which inevitably must have a race between Kid and Smoke, and what should have been the next-to-last scene, there are three additional scenes. They all could have been cut from the film without losing any story or character development; they are padding. It is not often I criticize a film editor by name, but Terilyn A. Shropshire, you suck.Are there good moments in this film? Sure. Derek Luke, so great in "Antwone Fisher," has a few instances of clarity. Some of his scenes with Vanessa Bell Calloway as Kid’s mother almost click. But in general, the acting is as soggy as the script. "Biker Boyz," in a word, stinkz.
download avi movies
movies buy
Biker Boyz full movie downloads
watch Biker Boyz movie
download online videos
watch Biker Boyz movies online
Biker Boyz full divx movie

watch Fountain, The videos online

September 15th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Fountain, The

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Fountain, The

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Fountain (Video Preview).avi30.45 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “Fountain, The” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

Fountain, The Reviewed By Erik Childress Posted 09/23/06 02:16:25

"Like Death Itself, The End Kinda Sucks" (Average)

SCREENED AT THE 2006 TORONTO INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL: It’s been six years since director Darren Aronofsky last (or first) wow’ed audiences with his harsh and disturbing drug epic, Requiem for a Dream. In the years since then, his follow-up project has been such a dream itself that there was doubt it would ever materialize into reality. Long thought of as a vehicle for Brad Pitt, this sci-fi tale about the quest for the Fountain of Youth has all the elements in place to stir the minds of science majors with a minor in philosophy. But in its own quest to out-puzzle the conclusion of Kubrick’s 2001, The Fountain will madden audiences’ receptivity not for answers, but coherency.The search for eternal life will thus span over 1000 years; a tricky feat to pull off in a mere 90 minutes. Story begins sometime in the 16th century where a Ponce de Leon-e conquistador, Tomas (Hugh Jackman), is down to the final leg of finding the fabled Tree of Life. It’s biblical implications provide thoughts of Indiana Jones’ first introduction as he’s left with a couple warriors to fend off a horde of Mayan warriors in a booby-trapped pit. When a fire-branded sword appears to cut his travails short, we are thrust to some period in the future where a now bald Jackman is the Buddha in the Bubble, floating through space eating bark and having memories of an angel-like figure named Izzi (Rachel Weisz). Flashing back to present time, Jackman is a doctor married to this Izzi who is on the fast track to the pearly gates courtesy of a terminal brain tumor. Determined to find a cure, Jackman’s Tommy tries an experimental treatment on a monkey with a substance his lab “found in that tree” in South America. His team leader (Ellen Burstyn) shows up to chastise his efforts from time to time even as the monkey begins showing signs of an unusual recovery. It’s own tumor isn’t decreasing, but everything else points to a reduction of aged cells and organs. As Tommy struggles to find the missing piece, Izzi has been crafting her own epic. And whaddya know, it’s named The Fountain, written in perfect cursive and without a single white-out. She’s even taken a page from Frodo and left the final chapter blank for her beloved husband to fill in. This middle section (which, thankfully, commands the story most of the way) coupled with the warrior story written about in Izzi’s unblemished manuscript works because it propels the mysteries of life and death just enough to keep our brains chugging along and gives us the emotional foothold to care for one’s struggle to solve them. The pseudo-intellectual musings about the tree’s powers and the nebula the Mayans believe to be linked to the afterlife are just this side of obtuse to allow viewers to begin forming their own theories about the “death is life” conceits that Izzi purports and we’ll experience visually later. But that’s about all that’s not obtuse about the narrative spun by Aronofsky and co-writer, Ari Handel. Much like Steven Soderbergh’s take on Solaris, which spoke greater volumes in its silence and truncated length than The Fountain ever does, the repetitious nature of yanking us back and forth and forthback from one time period to the next is destined to frustrate some and anger more just as they’re falling into understanding or appreciating the loaded text. The problems never end for the futuristic bubble boy portion. Apparently referred to as an astronaut in the 26th century, this is precisely the kind of information that’s lost unless you have a handy copy of the press notes or the director whispering commentary into your ear. We assume that this is the same Jackman character from 2006, but in what form? Is he human, leading us to believe that he partaked from Adam & Eve’s shady rib enhancer? Or has he expired and we’re in some version of a heavenly afterlife with memories feeding the tree’s roots in search of Xibalba? After a while you’re likely to stop caring and begin wondering if this Mayan nebula is what inspired the name for Lucas’ flying blue slave owner in The Phantom Menace.Those boos you may be hearing from those who make it through without walking out are liable to be for the film’s final act as it desperately tries to create its own “star gate” finale but reveals itself in such incomprehensible tones that anyone hanging from the plank is destined to let go. Those who let go long ago will find the concept of Jackman sucking a gooey white substance from the tree of life as about the silliest thing they’ve ever seen until the resulting effect appears of something out of Troll II and contradicts whatever outlook you may have had about the impenetrable bubble trevails. Aronofsky’s strength as a visual pugilist is undeniable, but unlike his hellish finale and multi-story strands of Requiem, The Fountain doesn’t have the lasting human connection despite having ten centuries to find one. Consciousness and paradoxes be damned, but what is the point of everlasting life if there’s not a life or a world worth living for.
Fountain, The full length movie
Fountain, The full movies
Fountain, The full movie downloads
divx Fountain, The movie
download online videos
download divx movies
full length Fountain, The movie online

watch full length Jerry Maguire movies

September 14th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Jerry Maguire

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Jerry Maguire

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Jerry Maguire (Video Preview).avi12.38 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “Jerry Maguire” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

The Movie:



Jerry Maguire” is director Cameron Crowe’s massive 1996 hit - the director’s most popular film after a series of highly-regarded prior films that were cult (but not box office) hits. After helming wonderful romantic comedies with great characters (”Singles”, “Say Anything”), “Jerry Maguire” has great characters, dialogue and scenes, but Crowe tried to make some sort of romantic epic - at 139 minutes, “Jerry Maguire” could have benefitted from being a tighter picture.



But, I’m getting ahead of myself. The film stars Tom Cruise as Jerry Maguire, a hotshot sports agent who suddenly finds himself disturbed at the state of affairs in his business. He spends all night writing an immense memo stating that the company should focus more on the individuals rather than trying to get as many clients as possible and giving them less attention. The rest of his company cheers his entrance next day, but there’s a sinking feeling underneath his comments; eventually, it becomes apparent that the company doesn’t share his feelings, leading to the famed “who’s coming with me?” sequence, which was wonderfully parodied in Tamara Davis’ “Half Baked”.



Classic moments are the order-of-the-day in “Jerry Maguire” and, while these sequences (such as the “Show Me the Money!” moment) stick out, they’re handled in an energetic way by Crowe that fuels the sequence. The “Show Me” sequence not only has the dialogue between Cuba Gooding, Jr. and Cruise, but the dwindling number of clients left available and holding on the phone adds an amount of tension and another dimension to the sequence. Many of the sequences in the film merge music and the sequence together, with the tunes complimenting the scenes - as they do in most of Crowe’s tune-heavy films - perfectly.



The film has a fair amount of things up in the air at once - most notably, Cruise’s Maguire battling to protect and promote his remaining client, Rod Tidwell (Cuba Gooding, Jr. in an Oscar-winning role) and falling for Dorothy Boyd (Renee Zellweger). The performances are very good - Cruise is at his most winning in a role that shows more range than most of his performances, while Zellweger is nice, but not terribly engaging - her and Cruise really don’t share that much chemistry, but she is able to sell the moments well enough. Gooding, Jr. is loud and funny, but he also has a nice amount of subtle moments where he shows that he really does care about more than being “shown the money!”. Technical credits are also excellent, with Janusz Kaminski’s beautiful, warm photography making the film lovely to watch.



Still, there’s that one glaring flaw that I find with this movie: the length. While there are moments in this movie that hit their notes perfectly, Crowe seems too happy with his own material; the great moments would be served better had they been not in-between some stretches that seem unnecessary, especially later in the middle. I like this movie - very much so at times, but I still don’t think it’s Crowe’s best (which, in my opinion, is still “Almost Famous”).




The DVD



VIDEO: “Jerry Maguire” is presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen. The presentation is not flawless, but it’s certainly an above-average effort that looks terrific, showing off Oscar-winner Janusz Kaminski’s beautiful, warm cinematography quite well. Sharpness and detail were excellent throughout, as the picture looked consistently crisp and well-defined, with no instances of noticable softness.



The presentation did have some minor flaws, but they really never became very bothersome, nor did the small flaws add up to irritation. There is a bit of slight noise now and then, but the picture doesn’t offer much of anything in the way of print flaws - a couple of specks are the total of wear on the print used. Edge enhancement is absent and only a slight trace or two of pixelation was seen.



The film’s very warm color palette was also well-presented here, appearing nicely saturated and vivid, with no smearing or other problems. Black level was solid, while flesh tones accurate and natural. Overall, this is a terrific effort from the studio. Subtitles are provided in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Korean and Thai.



SOUND: When I think of a dialogue-driven movie that isn’t going to require a lot of surround use, “Jerry Maguire” is one of the movies that comes to mind. Listening to this DVD edition for the first time, I was surprised that the film’s audio, while not agressive, is still a top-notch presentation with a lot to like. Music plays an important role in all of director Crowe’s films and this one is certainly no different. The music has terrific presence without getting in the way of dialogue or sound effects; it is also delivered with excellent clarity and often reinforced by the rear speakers. The surrounds also provide a fair amount of ambience; while they are not consistently employed for sound effects, I liked their appropriate use - it added nicely to the experience. Audio quality was excellent; the music sounded great across the front soundstage, coming through warmly and with excellent clarity. There wasn’t a lot of deep bass present, nor did there really need to be. Dialogue and sound effects both came through crisply and sounded natural.



MENUS: A montage of scenes from the movie leads into both of the main menus, which are also animated and boast music in the backgrounds.



EXTRAS:



Commentary: This is a commentary from director Cameron Crowe, actress Renee Zellweger, actor Cuba Gooding, Jr. and actor Tom Cruise. The second disc contains a “video commentary”; we watch the participants as they watch the movie, with a small box below showing the film itself. Cruise looks hilarious with a fisherman’s hat and shades, as if he’s running from photographers. As for the commentary, it’s an okay (at best) track, but given that Crowe’s other commentaries, such as the “Say Anything” track with John Cusack and Ione Skye, were much more insightful, this one comes off as dissapointing. The stars and Crowe are talkative, but it’s unfortunate that Crowe doesn’t seem to take the lead, as his intelligent and often very funny discussions of his films and filmmaking in general have made his previous tracks great listens. The three stars often seem to get a bit too caught up in watching the film - while they occasionally do provide some discussion of what went on behind-the-scenes, there are fairly sizable patches where they are either laughing along with the film or silently watching - or simply saying how good a scene or each other is. Overall, no one really seems to have that much to say about the movie, other than they all really liked it (which is okay, because it is a genuinely good movie, but that doesn’t make for much of a commentary).



Deleted Scenes: 5 deleted scenes are presented with optional commentary from director Cameron Crowe and editor Joe Hutching.



Rehersal Footage: 3 video clips are shown of the actors preparing for their scenes, including Gooding, Jr. and Cruise doing the “Show Me The Money!” sequence.



How To Be A Sports Agent: Real-life agent Drew Rosenhaus offers a short, but funny, interview where he goes through all the details of his day-to-day life, showing the amount of equipment he has to travel with to be prepared for any problems that could occur.



Also: A short, but informative and interesting “making of” featurette; text of the “mission statement”; Bruce Springsteen “Secret Garden” video; photo gallery; filmographies and trailers for “Maguire” and “As Good as It Gets”.



Note: There was a fair amount of discussion (I believe in an interview done with Movieline magazine, among other places) that a rehersal scene with Courtney Love (who was apparently trying out for the Zellweger part) was going to be included. Unless I simply missed it, it hasn’t been included, which is a bummer.



Final Thoughts: “
Jerry Maguire” is a great movie that just travels beyond its borders. Still, while overlong, it does have its share of classic moments and fine performances. Columbia/Tristar’s new Special Edition offers excellent audio/video and some moderately good supplements. Recommended.



good Jerry Maguire movies to watch
watch movies com
videos for download
download online Jerry Maguire videos
divx movie downloads
video downloads
full length Jerry Maguire episodes

watch a Dangerous Liaisons video

September 13th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Dangerous Liaisons

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Dangerous Liaisons

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Dangerous Liaisons (Video Preview).avi11.35 MBDOWNLOAD

The
movie


The high-society intrigues, cold-blooded seductions, and backstabbing
passions of Dangerous Liaisons make this 18th-century novel
ripe for film adaptations. And since the emotions behind the story
should ring just as true in the present day as in the past, why not
update and transform the story, setting it in 1960s Paris? While
we’re at it, why not make the film version longer? More of the
delicious intrigues will fit in three hours and twenty minutes of
running time, after all. It’s not such a terrible idea, but in the
end, the 2003 adaptation of Les Liaisons dangereuses misses
the point, and just delivers a bloated and unappealing walk-through
of the plot.


A thumbnail sketch of Les Liaisons dangereuses is that it
dresses up the characters from the novel – Madame de Mertuil
(Catherine Deneuve), Valmont (Rupert Everett), Madame de Tourvel
(Nastassja Kinski), and so on – in modern clothes, sets them in
modern surroundings, and stands back to say “Look at how
sophisticated this is!” Forget about developing the plot in an
intriguing manner; we’re just tossed in with the assumption that
we’ll enjoy seeing complete strangers discuss their love lives.
Forget about character development: these are no more than
stylishly-dressed cardboard figures.


It is, of course, impossible not to think of the brilliant and
sparkling Dangerous Liaisons that starred John Malkovich and
Glenn Close, in comparison, but even when resolutely thinking of Les
Liaisons
watch english movies online
download full Dangerous Liaisons movies
good movies to watch
watch videos online
watch movie
watch videos on line
watch english Dangerous Liaisons movies

online Manhunter movie

September 11th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Manhunter

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Manhunter

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Manhunter (Video Preview).avi8.08 MBDOWNLOAD

The most interesting Screenshots for the “Manhunter” movie:
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies
screenshot for moviesscreenshot for moviesscreenshot for movies

WHAT’S IT ALL ABOUT?


When Brett Ratner’s Red Dragon hit screens last year, all I could think was Why bother? The essential adaptation of Thomas Harris’s first novel starring Hannibal Lecter had already been filmed by Michael Mann in 1986. It was called Manhunter, and it had smarts and style and mood to spare. Last year’s Ed Norton starrer, a loud and irrelevant cashmonger, will never hold a candle to Manhunter, an admittedly dated but very fine adaptation of a classic thriller.

William Petersen (To Live and Die in LA) stars as Will Graham, troubled and retired FBI profiler whose career came to an abrupt end after his capture of the insidious Dr. Hannibal Lecktor (Brian Cox of Rushmore), who now seethes inside an ultra-white high-security lockup. To catch the ominous Lecktor, Graham had to delve inside the monster’s head—he had to teach himself how a serial killer thinks so that he might anticipate the killer’s next move. It’s a dark gift that Graham has—a curse, even—and now his former boss, Jack Crawford (Dennis Farina of Snatch) needs Graham’s help to solve a new case—that of the brutal and sickening Tooth Fairy (a genuinely disturbing Tom Noonan), who has murdered two entire families and shows no signs of stopping. To “recover the mindset,” Graham decides to visit Lecktor in his white cell, but the experience is terrifying, and soon, Lecktor and the Tooth Fairy—along with despicable newspaper reporter Freddy Lounds (Stephen Lang)—are in league against Graham. Racing against time, Graham and Crawford use every trick in their arsenal to find the Tooth Fairy before he strikes again.

Manhunter oozes neon moodiness, thanks to Mann’s Miami Vice stylings and the contributions of cinematographer Dante Spinotti, production designer Mel Bourne, and composer Michel Rubini. The film’s style is really the only element that dates the film, because otherwise, Manhunter is a tightly constructed and under-appreciated gem of a thriller that consistently keeps you on your toes. It’s a film that admirably never talks down to its audience, instead delivering its dialog and scenes matter-of-factly, in clipped, no-nonsense motion. The suspense builds naturally, an extension of the plot rather than forced through music and exaggerated emotion.

The film spends a great deal of time on its characters. How many thrillers today spend so much screen time humanizing the villain? Francis Dollarhyde (the Tooth Fairy) gets a significant subplot all his own, and we come to pity the poor fellow even in the midst of his heinous acts. Because Dollarhyde is very much a human being, displaying the whole spectrum of emotion, his inevitable actions are more and more terrible to behold. Peterson does an intricate job of bringing across Graham’s intense psyche, and has several scenes among his family that strike a solid emotional chord. But the revelation of the film is the performance of Cox as Lecktor. He exudes haughty yet calculated lunacy, and he’s a threatening presence, even from the confines of his ever-white cell. Despite his relatively short screen time (extended a bit in this cut), his presence is felt throughout the film.

WHAT’S NEW TO THIS CUT?


Strangely, we’ve never seen the actual theatrical cut of Manhunter on DVD. We’ve seen something close to it, but that version (Disc 1 of the Limited Edition) was missing key scenes. The unwatchable director’s cut on Disc 2 added some scenes we hadn’t seen before, but frustratingly, some of those are missing in this version. So Manhunter’s history on DVD is a hodgepodge of innacuracies.

As an example, on Disc 2 of the Limited Edition, when Graham visits Lecktor in his cell, there’s a brief scene in which he visits Dr. Chilton, and Chilton attempts to bait
Graham. And what about the marvelous scene (found on old VHS versions of the film), in which Graham delivers a monologue about the motivations of Dollarhyde? He talks about how someone has taken a child and manufactured a monster. It’s one of Peterson’s finest moments, but it ain’t here.

This director’s cut adds several scenes (adding to about 3 minutes) to the original theatrical version, but they’re largely inconsequential. I tried to keep a running tally of the added content, based on the quality of the film elements (see the “How’s It Look” section). But I got the sense, listening to Mann’s commentary, that other additions were made, using good film elements (for example, to the climactic showdown). Anyway, here’s what I came up with.

1) 00:00—Different opening credits. Instead of credits on black cards, the credits appear over the opening scene between Will and Crawford.

2) 16:30—Extended police briefing.

3) 23:10—Conversation between Will and Molly.

4) 26:20—Conversation between Will and Lecktor.

5) 53:50—Conversation between Will and Crawford.

6) 55:30—Molly and Will at the hotel.

7) 138:30—Conversation between Will and Crawford.

8) 142:10—Extension of Will watching movies.

9) 156:50—Will visits Dollarhyde’s next victims.

HOW’S IT LOOK?


Anchor Bay presents Manhunter: DiViMax Edition in a vivid anamorphic-widescreen transfer of the film’s original 2.35:1 theatrical presentation. Apparently, DiViMax is a special process that involves mastering the film from a high definition (HD) film source to “provide state-of-the-art picture quality.” I can’t argue too much with that goal, because this image is extremely fine—it’s the most clear, stable, and accurate image I’ve seen for Manhunter.

A direct comparison with the older 2-disc limited edition set reveals a few things. First, in comparison with the image quality of that set’s theatrical cut (which was admittedly striking), this new transfer is even more solid. Colors are more accurate within the film’s neon palette, and flesh tones are better. Whereas the earlier transfer had a greyish tone, even in faces, this new transfer looks as if a grey fog has been lifted from the proceedings to reveal a more naturalistic feel. Detail is more solid, reaching into backgrounds. Some shimmering plagued the earlier release, and it’s all but absent here. I still witness grain and mosquito noise in some bright scenes, but it’s nothing distracting, and it’s a step up from the older release. I noticed only minor edge halos. The print contains minor flaws and specks, but honestly, it’s cleaner than I expected. One interesting drawback that I noticed on several occasions was the existence of jarring little jitters in the image, as if frames are missing here and there. But that could be a player mishap—my Toshiba player might have very slight compatibility issues with the DiViMax process.

Second, I compared this version’s “director’s cut” footage with that of the 2-disc set. Throughout this new cut, Michael Mann has inserted new scenes and scene extensions (amounting to about 5 extra minutes), but he didn’t have the best source material to work with. Apparently, he had trouble finding the film’s original negative and had to resort to less-than-ideal elements. The result is that all the footage contained in the original theatrical cut looks pristine and sharp, but the inserted “director’s cut” footage is somewhat ugly with grain and the appearance of a grey gauze over the film. That being said, the appearance of this footage is far, far better—much more stable, with better color and detail—than that of the older 2-disc set, which was an absolutely hideous, cropped, wobbly piece of excrement. On this new disc, there were a few instances in which I was so involved in the film that I didn’t notice that change in quality. Which is not to say that the difference in quality is largely unnoticeable—if you’re watching for it, you’ll definitely notice it. But considering the source elements, Anchor Bay has done a bang-up job of bringing Mann’s preferred cut to your living room.

HOW’S IT SOUND?


Well, here’s a disappointment. This new disc contains only a Dolby Digital 2.0 track. Considering the older 2-disc set’s inclusion of a Dolby Digital 5.1 track, which offered nice ambient surround activity, this is bit of a letdown. On the plus side, however, this soundtrack seems an accurate representation of the film’s original audio presentation, offering good directionality across the front soundstage. Although the film has lost some fidelity over the years, and some of the presentation seems somewhat brittle and lacking in the low end, dialog remains fairly accurate, and the music comes across nicely, if not fully. Manhunter won’t give your subwoofer a workout.

Another drawback: No subtitles.

WHAT ELSE IS THERE?


The primary extra is a Commentary with Director Michael Mann that is quite satisfying despite containing occasional lapses into silence. In his gruff Chicago drawl, Mann provides some excellent background material for the experience of Manhunter, including comments about the specific scenes he’s added to this—as he puts it—”director’s preferred version.” He also talks about the anatomy of motive and his views on the serial killer phenomenon. He makes special mention of the ways that his script departs from the text of the Thomas Harris novel, particularly in the case of the Dollarhyde character. The track has a bit of an edited-together feel, as if it was recorded in at least two sessions.

You also get Manhunter’s Theatrical Trailer.

Also included is a collection of Still Galleries, divided into Production Stills, Delted & Alternate Scenes, and Posters & Advertising subsections. This is a meaty collection of photos that includes many stills from scenes not even included on this disc.

Finally, you can view Manhunter’s Screenplay in PDF format on your computer.

WHAT’S LEFT TO SAY?


This new DiViMax DVD of Manhunter corrects some wrongs of the previous 2-disc set—offering fantastic image quality and a very satisfying director commentary—but mysteriously leaves out a 5.1 surround presentation. Nevertheless, this disc is very much worth your time and cash. The physical presentation of that previous set, however, is so cool that you’ll probably want to keep it. Perhaps you could simply toss the hideous Disc 2 “director’s cut” of that version and replace it with this one.


full length video
Manhunter divx trailers
divx movie downloads
Manhunter full movies
Manhunter video download
download dvd movies
divx Manhunter dvd movie

watch Wild at Heart full movies online

September 10th, 2008 by buymovies

Download Wild at Heart

DOWNLOAD MOVIE Wild at Heart

Just $2.99 for a complete movie! No additional software or browser plug-ins required! You can play them for unlimited number of times whenever you want. Downloaded movies will work perfectly on any PC, DVD player, PDA etc.

DIVX ($2.99)DVD($4.99)IPOD ($1.99)
Video Previews (divx):
File NameSize:Video preview
Wild at Heart (Video Preview).avi9.16 MBDOWNLOAD

“When all the world is a hopeless jumble

And the raindrops tumble all around

Heaven opens a magic lane

When all the clouds darken up the skyway

There’s a rainbow highway to be found

Leading from your window pane

To a place behind the sun

Just a step beyond the rain”

- “Over the Rainbow”, The Wizard of Oz

Somewhere, in the great, vast unknown of the universe, a real Emerald City awaits. It may not contain a wizard, or an untamed set of flying primates. There are no witches patrolling its borders, or munchkins manning its infrastructure. The road there is not paved with yellow bricks, good intentions or those best laid plans that mice and men often fret over. It’s a point on the compass unreachable by regular means, and legerdemain can only provide a minimal of guidance. If you’re lucky enough to find it, if you can set your emotions to the right frequency and dive deeper into your core than you’ve ever traveled before, the rewards will be tremendous. And so will be the sorrows. In this jade green metropolis, senses are heightened and thoughts are opiates. Those hobbled by hurt are miraculously cured while others stifled by sin are saved. It’s not Heaven, and it may be Hell. Dreams have been known to go there to die, and nightmares can occasionally call it home. It can be a wonderland of untapped pleasures. Yet is can also be a place that pierces the heart and drains the soul.

Indeed, in the land of Love, humanity melds with misery and wrecks havoc on the faint of spirit. It plays its siren song to lure you along the rocks of lust and longing, pulling you toward your eventual fated ‘fall’. There are fulfillments more meaningful than any to be had in life, and defeats deadlier than the most powerful weapon. Very few make the overlong journey, and there is usually less reward in the arrival than in the voyage. But some will brave its shores, if only to mine its treasure laden tunnels and sip its slightly salted waters. It is the final destination for Sailor Ripley and Lula Fortune, two lovers trying to escape the wicked, wanton world around them. In the verdant spires of Love’s castles and the deep dark lushness of its forests, there is rawness and renewal, peace and fertility. But there is also a slimy subterranean level of disease, mold and rot, a poison that could potentially destroy them both.

In a world that is weird on top and untamed in empathy, love is not only a redeemer, but a ruiner as well. And as envisioned by one of the true geniuses of modern moviemaking, David Lynch, it’s a domain located along a road less taken and badly traveled. In his magnificent, mannered 1990 opus, Wild at Heart, there are all manner of adventures and wonderful sights. But there is a collision between life and death, good and evil that will sully and stain the celebration. And one thing is for sure: our couple won’t be in Kansas anymore…not that they ever really were there in the first place.

The DVD:
They are a couple on the run. After serving almost 2 years for manslaughter in the Pee Dee Correctional Facility, Sailor Ripley has been reunited with his inseparable soul mate, Lula Fortune, and they intend to celebrate. Their favorite band, Powermad, is in town and the hot, sweaty scent of a local hotel room beckons. There is no turning back. Sailor wants to put his checkered past and lack of parental guidance behind him and make a new life. Lula’s goals are a little more vague. Pained by the death of her father (he burned to death in a ‘questionable’ act of self-immolation) and burdened by a mother who has a sordid, secret agenda against her man, this little girl lost is merely looking for someone to make her feel safe and secure. Sailor promises said protection, and knowing Momma is already up in arms, the pair determines to hit the road for the possible promised land of California.

But indeed Marietta Fortune has other ideas. This luminous bitch, bathed in the light of her own smoldering vindictiveness, wants Lula back and Sailor dead, and she will stop at nothing to achieved both of those aims. Initially, she thinks that the easy-going goodwill of boyfriend/private detective Johnny Farragut is the answer. But he seems to be more sympathetic with the young lover’s plight than concerned. Desperate, Marietta calls on criminal colleague – and part-time paramour - Marcellus Santos, to help her. There is a shady, secret connection between the couple that seems to ensnare both Lula and Sailor at alternate points in their lives. With the help of mob boss Mr. Reindeer and a hideous hitman named Bobby Peru, Lula and Sailor are marketed. And as they amble into Big Tuna, Texas, it appears that it’s the end of the yellow brick road for these heroic idealists. And the end of love as well.

Like when planets collide or stars supernova, like the aura of turmoil and temperance that results from a mixing of atmospheres, Wild at Heart is a film about galaxies interacting, about worlds fusing and fighting. It marks a turning point in virtuoso auteur David Lynch’s career, the beginning of a kind of trilogy to duality which would continue with two other masterpieces, 1997’s Lost Highway and 2001’s Mulholland Dr. All would explore the realms of existence, from the real to the ephemeral, fantastical vs. miserable. Forged in and around the same time as his other quintessential work, Twin Peaks (both Heart and Peaks arrived in 1990) there are definite overlaps in both theme and convention with that titanic television series. It represents, in the story and its telling, a liberation, a new sense of artistic experimentation for this true motion picture original.

Lynch loves to manipulate perception in order to play games, to give his audiences just the slightest hints at hidden precepts until he’s good and ready to spring them on us. His celluloid canvases are clear works of aesthetic grandeur (a natural result, considering the filmmaker’s fine arts background) using light like paint brushes, settings as still lives and people as pigments. With the deft hand of an expressionist matched against a surrealist’s sense of folly, Lynch splashes grimness onto glory, the grotesque upon the gorgeous to turn beauty bad and the disgusting into something desirable. His movies are always unique, individual compositions marching to their own indefinable drummer and announcing their arrival in bold, baffling terms. More or less dismissed by the popular culture as a crackpot, or a resolute jester to all that is sacred about cinema, Lynch can be obtuse for even the most in-tune film fan. But Wild at Heart marks something monumental in his oeuvre, a moment that may even eclipse his first monochrome macabre of maternity, Eraserhead.

Whereas, in the past, he explored this visionary variation in that most personal, problematic movie (Eraserhead’s baby as bane of existence is an exercise in cautionary claustrophobia) Wild at Heart reintroduces this dynamic to his work. With the success of the exceedingly personal Blue Velvet – so much like a fever dream of Lynch’s small town sensibility that it practically radiates with relevance – the director felt free to experiment, to juxtapose even more of his mind bending brainstorms up against the conventions of the motion picture format to transform the medium into something you could sense, as well as see: an attempt to expand the movie’s influence into the realm of another sense – touch.

Like a daydream being constantly tormented by oncoming demons, or a nightmare in which the wonderful land of Oz becomes an ever growing cesspool of cynicism and crime, Wild at Heart is at once both simple and complex, wholly complete and far too open ended. Like a lecture in allegorical symbolism lost in its own maelstrom of meaning, it is a film fashioned in the most abundant of literary realms, while failing to follow the given grammatical rules for such metaphorical suggestions. Some have called it the Wizard of Oz meets Bonnie and Clyde, or Sid and Nancy go to Candyland. Both definitions fail to recognize the singular vision Lynch applies to this tale (even if the main characters and part of the plot are taken from author Barry Gifford’s novel of the same name). At its center, Wild at Heart is Badlands with more elusive ethics, It Happened One Night with far more obvious sex. Sure, the story of wicked witches and magical realms is relevant here, but Wild at Heart is striving for something of its own. And it succeeds in ways both special and subversive.

At the time of its release, the Frank L. Baum angle was greatly hyped, as if Lynch had found a new, novel way of incorporating the phantasmagoric fiction created by the author directly into his narrative. In many ways, time has only depressed these allusions, making them both more potent and far less meaningful. The easy connection is that, just like Wizard, Wild at Heart is nothing more than a strange exploration of what it is to grow older and discover yourself. Certainly, there is a yellow brick road of sorts, except the saffron sheen comes from the line of industrial paint down the center of a long, lost interstate and the cobbles have been replaced by hot Southern tarmac.

In Lula Fortune, we have a kind of Dorothy, a young woman escaping her sorry domestic circumstance for a journey of discovery in a brand new, liberating way. Far less concerned about returning home than finding her own fantasyland of love and sex, this wayward child only gets scared when the real world comes nipping at the gates of her illusion. Certainly, she is blinded by inexperience and a lack of wisdom, but there is a power in her possibilities, something that keeps her fueled to move forward.

Dorothy definitely needs her nemesis, and mother Marietta fills those foul, wicked witch booties rather nicely. A matron both channeling and changed by the baneful black arts she has sold her soul to, dame Fortune spins as wildly as the wheel bearing her moniker. Like the great hand of the gods sweeping over all to control the fate and destiny of the pitiful players she thinks are under her control, she’s manipulation on the verge of implosion. Crafting schemes upon plots, cons inside of ruses, she’s played all the sides against each other for so long that iniquity is the only result her actions can have. Inhabiting a space neither recognizable nor realistic, Marietta is like a wasp trapped between the screen and the door. She’s fighting mad to get out and attack: only problem is, she doesn’t recognize who her true enemy is, or the results her villainy filled outbursts will have.

Sadly, Sailor is not the great and powerful Oz. He is not the humbug Prof. Marvel, a hallow man of smoke and mirrors. Sailor may occasionally channel those evil spirits that lie on the outskirts of the Emerald City (and in that way, he does resemble the half man, half hologram aspects of the Wizard), but that is not his true self. He is not the Tin Man, as he has a deep well of emotion and an inherently decent heart. He is not the Scarecrow, even though he makes some incredibly boneheaded decisions along the road to his eventual redemption. No, the closest creature to Mr. Ripley’s glorified good intentions and sensitive demeanor – at least around Lula – is the Cowardly Lion. He is capable of great violence and even greater sweetness. He is thoughtful as well as primal, instinctual and spontaneous. He may cower when the responsibilities of adulthood come calling, but he will defend his helplessly lost ladylove until the day he dies.

As much as it manipulates and modifies this classic mythology, Wild at Heart is really its own modern day fairy tale, a story of a sexual dream state constantly attacked and tattered by the outside world swirling around it. It’s a fable founded in fucking, an epic poem carved out of hope, fear, the sinister and the sublime. While Lynch is often accused of confusing his narrative to suit his own arcane purposes, this is nothing more than a standard saga of star-crossed lovers about to arrive at their last intergalactic way station. It’s the never-ending battle between youth and maturity, freedom and accountability, situated in a realm where elements both magical and maniacal pop into place, diffuse their dense, deep desire, and fade away into the wormwood. Within it’s fabric, Wild at Heart is a parable for the instinctual struggle between childhood and growing up. It pits rebellion against responsibility, bravado against mortality to signify what is, perhaps, the greatest inner earthquake someone can go through. Sailor and Lula want to avoid, or even cheat this concept, hoping to find their own natural Neverland in the far off breezes of the calm, California coast. But just like the buckshot that pierces the signs along those dirty back roads of hidden America, life is taking target practice against them.

This is filmmaking as a funny, fatal foretelling about everlasting love. Wild at Heart is essentially that typical formula road trip in which realms of existence, not individual archetypes, interlock and clash. We get the eccentric characters along the way, the evocative locales, and the constant threat that keeps our impassioned pawns on the move. But there is also something more divine, more transient at work here. That long stretch of pavement Lula and Sailor are moving along is part Heaven (New Orleans) and part Hell (Texas), a roadmap from the joy of being betrothed and all the fantasy elements that surround that feeling (the high voiced man in the bar, the impromptu dance party in the fading sunset). But once they come across a car accident, where they witness a wounded passenger stumble and fumble for life, they enter a decidedly dark place, a rancid ribbon of blacktop reaching down into the very bowels of the underworld itself. By the time they reach Big Tuna (in classic mythology, fish often symbolize a static state somewhere between bliss and banishment) they’re like the renegades waiting on the posse. They can sense that punishment is coming, they just aren’t sure from where – and whether is will be external, or internal.

It’s interesting to note the lack of sex in the latter part of the narrative. Indeed, Lula announces the end to the pre-marital fun by vomiting all over the Iguana Hotel room. It’s a sign to Sailor, a heavy-handed note indicating that passion has served its purpose: now its time to pay the personal piper. For the first half of the film, fornication is symbolic shorthand, a way of showing closeness and connection without the wasted energy of words or witticisms. One senses that this is a couple founded in copulation, and that all other aspects of their relationship have been a direct outgrowth from their personal fire. Like the old clichés claim, sex is an awakening, an ultimate bond of both giving and taking. At the start, Lula is Sailor’s erotic equal, a woman who wants as much as he does to apply and receive pleasure. But as the various vicious elements of the outside world start to creep in, as her mother’s vice grip extends its murderous maw, the ballet of the bedroom ebbs, and then drops off. By the finale, you sense that the physicality the couple once shared has been tossed into the hot desert wind just outside their rank, repugnant room.

There are many other emblems, some more obvious than others, utilized during this expedition into the ether. Recalling icons from the past melded with a hangman’s homage, Sailor’s fixation with Elvis and Lula’s Marilyn Monroe on moon pies are both realities and red herrings in Lynch’s lunatic lament. The King was at one time a ferocious rebel, the riotous race music man that every parent feared his or her child would fancy. But sometime after the arrival of The Beatles, the Boy from Tupelo mellowed into a matinee idol of ineffectualness. In Sailor’s obsession with his songs and his persona, we see both sides of the man called Presley – the original danger devil and the kinder, softer simp. Monroe, for her part, played the pained sex symbol to the hilt, dying to be respected while trading on the talents that got her noticed in the first place. As embodied by Lula, this concept takes a decidedly depraved turn, as its molestation and abortion, not fame and a false sense of security that sends Heart’s glamour gal closer to the edge.

Other visual cues come from some of the film’s more memorable moments. When Marietta fears she’s doomed her child by getting Marcellus involved, she goes on a mad makeup jag that results in her face being covered in bright red lipstick. Certainly, this is a symbol of rage and savage sexuality, but it is also a mask, an attempt for the manic mother to hide from the horrors she’s fostering. The vile, villainous Bobby Peru is walking, talking toxicity, a man whose mouth has been reduced to a series of stumpy, rotting teeth. Certainly, this showcases his inner degeneracy, but it also suggests that something about Bobby is biologically evil, as if his genetics knew how he would turn out and signified it for the rest of the population with a polluted, poisoned rima oris. From Sailor’s none-too-subtle snakeskin jacket (it’s better to hear him explain what it means) to the evident flaws shared by most of the criminals (misshapen legs, unfortunate hair) Lynch is occasionally heavy handed. But when he wants to sneak one by us, he does so with memorable, malleable mischief.

Take the brilliant, baffling Crispin Glover, essaying the impossible to trace deranged manchild Cousin Dell. As described by Lula, Dell is a misguided young man with a fetish for placing bugs in his ass and an unhealthy devotion to Christmas. Lula considers him the epitome of the influence of “bad” thoughts (Dell also has those white trash givens of fearing aliens and watching for men in black). Sailor thinks he’s just insane. When Lula finishes the anecdote about the her mixed up family member (which we witness in one of Lynch’s most arrestingly visualized set pieces) she mentions how, one day, Dell just disappeared, and this is a very telling statement, something that sums up Wild at Heart in a definitely nutty shell. Dell’s vanishing represents the ultimate escape, the phoenix-like ascension into another, far better(?) plane. But it also represents menace, as a certifiable unhinged individual is roaming the world with acidic, antisocial thoughts running around in his Yuletide obsessed head.

Glover literally transforms himself in the role, getting lost in the fringes of playing someone who’s finally made it, albeit internally, into their own private fantasy world. Only speaking one line, but saying several sensational volumes in his body language and attitude, Dell becomes the central image of Wild at Heart. He’s the carefree corrupted, the innocent inundated by the terrors of reality until he simply snaps.

Glover is not to be outdone in the performance department by the quartet of quality that comes from the leads. Laura Dern has never been better as Lula, expressing both a liberating sense of lust and a deep, dark desire for affection in her wounded, wilting child bride brazenness. As her partner, paramour and main problem, Nicholas Cage seems to separate himself from his Method and actually come across as both artificial and organic. When required to put on the machismo and call up the criminality, he can match any bad ass move for move. But in his more contemplative modes, this is a young man who still believes in the power of love and the healing hands of a glowing, good witch. As Beelzebub with a need for an orthodontist, or at least a set of dentures, Willem Dafoe is note-for-note perfection as the precarious, perverted Bobby Peru. It is one of his best performances, filled with dark humor, palpable menace and a rotten, raging set of hormones. When he stops and laughs at Sailor during the film’s final violent outburst, face covered by a nylon stocking and mouth cracked open in an unsane smile, Dafoe is debasement and dross, pus poured into a human form and made animate by the bile of a billion condemned corpses.

Interestingly, the film’s most initially praised exercise in excess - by Laura Dern’s real life mother Diane Ladd as Marietta Fortune – is today it’s most unclear. There is no doubt what Ladd the actress is doing here. She is channeling her own mothering instincts into a Actor’s Studio slagheap of sense memory, and placing the entire conceit into a cauldron over very high heat, simply waiting for it to boil and bubble over. Then she will add in her own atomic anger and Marietta’s murderous mean streak and amplify the entire enterprise with volts of venom. To suggest that Ladd is over the top is, perhaps, to miss something more suggestive about her performance. And make no mistake, she does command the screen and fill it with her enchantress as amoral gun moll necromancy.

Yet Marietta has not aged well over the years, moving from serial killer to shrew over the course of a decade and a half. What once seemed like showboating now comes off as partially pathetic. It turns Marietta into less of a villain and more of a victim, and it’s not an easy place for this performance to sit. Lynch probably saw Marietta as Frank Booth without the need for Oedipus’s problems to fuel her rage. He is half right, and the impression that Ladd leaves is not necessarily one of theatrical brilliance. She is playing to the back row, meaning she occasionally misses the mezzanine and the orchestra.

Still, it’s a testament to Lynch’s undeniable skill as a filmmaker that nothing Ladd does or tried to do cheats or sidetracks his film. Indeed, just like Freddy Jone’s high-pitched speech about pigeons or the naked obese women running around in Big Tuna, this hysterical, hammy over the top thespian treat adds untold scope to the simple story at play. It is conceivable that, at some point in the future, this director could make a visually dull film, but Wild at Heart was and is not that mediocre movie. Loading his lens with a rainbow of realties and playing with both the tenets and the terms of reality, he opens up the doorway to a region where Oz streams with offal, where paradise pulsates with infection and even the most basic of elements – a tiny lamp, a silver dollar – radiate with an unspeakable optical force.

A master of narrative misdirection (the ballsy bifurcated storyline of Lost Highway, the sudden shift into an alternative reality in Mulholland Dr.), Lynch avoids such a sudden swerve here by flawlessly balancing all his aspects – fantasy and foul, honorable and reprobate – like a flim flam man juggling a jillion crystal shells. Certainly, the final sequence is a definite leap into the illogical, but when viewed against all he has laid out before, it makes perfect sense. While he would go on to surpass this achievement several times over in his next few films, Wild at Heart remains the starting gate, the place where Lynch finally left the methods of the mainstream behind him to follow his own yellow brick road. And the result is something so sensational, so filled with meaning and importance that it could be studied several times, and something new found each time. In a career marked with more monumental magnum opuses than full-out flops, Wild at Heart heralds the final break from the norm for this formidable filmmaker. And the institution of cinema has been the better for it. This is a great motion picture, realized by one of the medium’s true masters.

The Video:
Lynch personally supervised the remaster, and more importantly, the re-color correcting and re-timing of this DVD transfer (something he explains in great detail in his discussion on the technology as part of the disc’s wealth of extras) and the results are breathtaking. Undoubtedly one of the best anamorphic widescreen images this critic has witnessed, Wild at Heart literally shimmers from within its 2.35:1 original aspect ratio. Those of you who have only experienced this film in its original, horrendous full frame VHS video versions – or less than detailed laser disc – will have your sensibilities shaken by how absolutely amazing this movie looks.

Rivaled only by the recent issue of Eraserhead by Lynch himself (and the awe-inspiring print of Mulholland Dr. provided by Universal’s DVD), Wild at Heart is a clean, crisp example of digital perfection. Flames burst forth like the very fires of Hell themselves and the vast vistas of America stretch out like lost canvases from God’s own gallery. Frame-by-Frame, element-by-element, Lynch went back and painstakingly reworked each and every bit of this picture, and the results are stupendous. More than living up to its fairytale ideal, Wild at Heart is now a truly magical looking movie.

The Audio:
For Lynch, sound is just another aspect of the overall cinema experience. It is not an afterthought or a simple case of sound corresponding to motion. The audio elements of his films are just as important as the visual, and Wild at Heart does not skimp on astounding sonics. Presented in both the original Dolby Digital Stereo sound (very, VERY good) and a brand new, 5.1 Surround mix, this is one amazing aural experience. When matches alight, the sparks send the speakers into seismic shudders. Conversations caress the channels and ancillary elements fill in and flesh out many of the scene dynamics. Lynch is also one of the few directors who understands the need for negative space and ambient atmosphere, and the sensational soundtrack to the film is a definite derivation of this ideal.

With the help longtime Lynch collaborator Angelo Badalamenti, the music sours with a resonance that suggests both the fabled and fatalistic nature of the narrative. And of course, there will be those of you who instantly recognize Chris Isaak’s “Wicked Game” as it plays out – perfectly - over a pivotal night driving scene. In combination with the mix and the other mood-enhancing facets, this is one fabulous auditory experience.

The Extras:

In a move that will have fans cheering while simultaneously wondering why other studios can’t follow suit, Wild at Heart is given a sensational, special edition treatment that drowns the disc in delightful contextual additions. First up is the aforementioned David Lynch: On the DVD featurette, a small but highly substantive look at the remastering process. Amiable and eager to explain – which more or less sums up his attitude toward all of his appearances here – Lynch gives us the grand tour of how DVD is created, crafted and, interestingly, corrupted. It helps explain why it takes so long to get his films on the digital medium. The director himself is the subject of a borderline puff piece entitled Specific Spontaneity: Focus on David Lynch. More or less a series of testimonials by the actors and crew interviewed for the Wild at Heart Making of documentary, there is some great stuff here along side all the gladhanding. Just to hear these actors discuss his directing approach is worth the price of admission.

Additional marketing material can be found in the original electronic press kit for the film. It’s fascinating to see how Hollywood tried to position this movie when it was originally released. There are several TV spots (all of which focus more on Cannes and Twin Peaks that the film itself) and the original theatrical trailer. Along with a nice, if non-essential slide show presentation of our lost lovers (entitled “Sailor and Lula’s Image Gallery̶ ;) and some MGM ads, the basic components of a professional release are all in place.

But the real gems come in the following two finds. In Love Death Elvis & Oz almost everyone involved in the film – from author Gifford to Grace Zabriskie (who played the near cameo role of hitwoman Juana) are here to talk about what it was like to make this amazing movie. It’s all plaudits and partial recall as Cage, Dern, Ladd, Dafoe, Glover and others discuss the opportunity to work with the legendary man, and how much kinship they felt with their characters. Filled with insights into deleted sequences and missing moments (many of the more oddball characters saw their dialogue literally disappear in editing), this 30 + minute journey through the film’s genesis and general acceptance is engrossing and engaging.

Even better is something called Dell’s Lunch Counter. Using an interactive menu screen (you click on various piles of scrunched up sandwiches lying on a countertop – anyone who’s already seen the film should be chuckling at that concept) we are treated to nine interview outtakes concerning such divergent details as how the characters of Lula and Sailor came about, the meaning of the red pipe, the good witch and the pigeons speech, some discussion of Cannes and the snakeskin jacket. It’s a great added feature, one that truly fleshes out the scope and stature of this amazing movie.

And for those of you who care: Yes, the DVD does have chapter stops.

Final Thoughts:
Most of us never get to the land of Love. We usually breakdown somewhere along the route and settle for the next ride that comes along, hoping it’s not too horrible or hard. For others, the stay is temporary, Visa voided before the complete experience can be had. In some ways, it’s better to think that love never comes, or when it does, that it won’t last. Over time, love fades and changes, breaking down and disintegrating. In it’s place, other emotions should exist, more solid sentiments like faith and trust, honesty and friendship. Passion can be the place where you build your hideaway for happiness, but it should never be the mortar that holds up the walls. Once the ardor dissipates, your structure is left vulnerable to decay and demolition.

For Sailor and Lula, love seems to have conquered all. It has made them wiser and instilled a sense of caution into what was once a carefree celebration. But it’s definitely no merry old land of Oz. Indeed, the wizard is long gone and the wicked witch is just a minor memory. In their place are the lessons life has longed to teach them, the portents closing off the past forever. Of course, one can always pray for a little magic, a chance to taste the sweet succulence of youth one more time, pitfalls and perils be damned. It is possible you know. Sailor and Lula think so. So does David Lynch. All you have to do is believe. All you have to do is be wild…at heart.

Are you Tinsel Torn?
Come to Bill’s weekly Theatrical Review Blog and find out? Click Here
Wild at Heart video download
full lenth Wild at Heart movies
download Wild at Heart movie trailers
download full dvd
watch divx movie
full length video
Wild at Heart full movie download